JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 26, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Rafael Quintero Arrubla·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar el cumplimiento del fallo en asuntos de gran trascendencia social
Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Accion De Tutela En Materia De Asociacion Sindical Y Permiso Sindical
  • Competencia de juez de primera instancia para abrir incidente de desacato en sentencia T-322/98
  • No asumir solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato de sentencia T-322/98
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de Desacato: El memorialista presentó incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-322/98y la Sala precisó que no existe la necesidad de que la Corte directamente lo tramite.

Se decide NO ASUMIR el incidente impetrado y remitir al despacho de primera instancia, esto es, el Juzgado Sexto Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, la petición para que determine lo que estime pertinente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por el señor Juan Rafael Quintero Arrubla.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-322 de 1998, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  4. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →A. 159/13T-222/21 — Accion De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales-Improcedencia Por No Configurarse Defectos Alegados En Inadmision De Recurso De Casacion En · cited 3 timesT-222/212021
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.